Cases 131 - 140 of 832,393
N. et al v. Department of Education et al
as 1:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
L. N. and B. N.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education and David C. Banks
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Johnson v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 1:2024cv05584
Plaintiff:
Douglas Johnson
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cummings v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Justin T Cummings
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Farah v. Somaliland Mission USA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Abdullahi Mohamed Farah
Defendant:
Somaliland Mission USA, LLC, Somaliland Support Organization, Inc., Yassin Meri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Foreign State Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jean-Rene v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Markis Jean-Rene
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Tenesee Jr. v. Messerlli
as 3:2024cv01143
Petitioner:
Anthony Jordan Tenesee Jr.
Defendant:
K. Messerlli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
