Cases 281 - 290 of 832,393
Rigal, Quelyory v. U. S. Attorney General et al
as 0:2024cv61156
Plaintiff:
Quelyory A. Rigal and Quelyory Antonelly Rigal El
Defendant:
U. S. Attorney General, Riselda Ruiz, Albin Calixte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramey v. Navajo Express, Inc.
as 1:2024cv05541
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ramey
Defendant:
Navajo Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
LEE v. PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT et al
as 2:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
CHERIECE LEE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT and FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENN. PHILADELPHIA PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zito LLC v. Fastenal Company
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Zito LLC
Defendant:
Fastenal Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gardner v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Paul Gardner
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Washoe County, Michael Trebian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marshall
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Steven Dettelbach, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bebber v. Goodman
as 8:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Eric Bebber
Defendant:
Michelle Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
