Cases 11 - 20 of 770
Rogers v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tareynton Reshard Rogers
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Shawn Phillips and Joshua Kays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littleton v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv10333
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin Littleton
Defendant:
John Doe, Katelyn Cairnduff, Roger Hunter and others
Newell v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Timothy Newell
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Roger Wilson and Lisa Hoying
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley Franklin v. Franklin County, KY, et al
as 23-6107
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY FRANKLIN
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, KY, RICK ROGERS and WES CULBERTSON
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyles #132720 v. Braman
as 1:2023cv01183
Petitioner:
Roger L. Lyles #132720
Respondent:
Melinda Braman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeHart v. Montgomery County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2023cv00311
Executor:
Bonnie DeHart
Defendant:
Montgomery County Fiscal Court, Ian Roberts, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baugh v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Roger Kent Baugh
Respondent:
Warden LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rogers v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rogers
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Hawkins County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
