Cases 211 - 220 of 831,391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024bk10810
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC) Gaither v. Williams. et al.
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Burrell A Gaither
Defendant:
Williams, A. George, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office et al
as 5:2024cv03721
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office, S. Huss, A. Coudillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RADCLIFFE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
TERRIS RADCLIFFE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JOEL THACKER, TYLER EVAN BURGAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
ATECHGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
ATECHGOV, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Israel v. Tomlison et al
as 4:2024cv03718
Plaintiff:
Akiva Israel
Defendant:
S. Tomlison, C. Sanchez, Correctional Officer Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. AINSLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
S. JALIL REED
Defendant:
C.O. AINSLEY, C.O. COOPER and SGT NAHLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moss v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv01144
Petitioner:
Clovis Costell Moss, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PATTERSON v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
TRACY PATTERSON
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
