Cases 91 - 100 of 124
Davis v. Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Teresa Davis
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball v. Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02550
Plaintiff:
Erik Ball
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loren v. Family Dollar Stores of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv13646
Plaintiff:
Pamela J Loren
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Michigan, Inc. and Realty Income Properties 17, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slone et al v. Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, Ltd et al
as 7:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Brenda Slone and Clay Slone
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Kentucky, Ltd and Family Dollar Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Family Dollar Store
as 3:2015cv00405
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Lewis
Defendant:
Family Dollar Store
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Machus et al v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv14955
Plaintiff:
Lisa Machus , Kenneth Machus, Jr., Bonita Orlando and others
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc and Taleo Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mason v. Wal-Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Guy Mason
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporation , Kmart Holding Corporation, Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks Jr. v. Family Dollar Stores of Michigan Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12941
Plaintiff:
Andre Roy Parks Jr.
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Michigan Inc. and Family Dollar Stores #5414
Mejia v. Family Dollar Stores of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12928
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Michigan, Inc. , Leslie Collins and Jonathan Riehl
Plaintiff:
Melanie D. Mejia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
