Cases 11 - 20 of 316
Morton v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Morton
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rigoni v. Morton
as 2:2023cv11482
Plaintiff:
Corinne Mary Rigoni
Defendant:
Erron Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fannie Mae v. Amelia AID Propco LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia AID Propco LLC, Ashley AID Propco LLC, Bentley AID Propco and others
Receiver:
Michael F. Flanagan
Cain #490544 v. Unknown Parties #1 et al
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cain #490544
Defendant:
Unknown Parties #1, Unknown Morton, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
MARY MORTON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Morton v. George et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morton
Defendant:
Shane George, Sam Braggs and Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. George et al
as 3:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morton
Defendant:
Shane George, Sam Braggs and Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Morton
as 1:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Long
Defendant:
Robert L. Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dougherty v. Autoliv ASP Inc., et al
as 1:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Dougherty
Defendant:
DAP Products, Inc., Donald McKay Smith Inc, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Pneumo Abex LLC, R.E. Kramig & Co., Inc., Red Seal Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
