Cases 11 - 20 of 1,231
Horn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Debra Horn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones #617568 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones #617568
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Justin Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Horne v. Thurman et al
as 3:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Cartez Horne
Defendant:
Justin Thurman, Sean Phillips and John Hollinsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden Horn International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Hadalgo, LLC
as 1:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Golden Horn International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Hadalgo, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gibbons v. Phipps et al (TV2)
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gibbons
Defendant:
Dale Phipps, City of Kingsport, Tennessee, Daniel Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Deng v. Boom
as 3:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ngong Lang Deng
Defendant:
Judge Claria Horn Boom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horne v. Rardin
as 1:2023cv12209
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Horne
Defendant:
E. Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Boom
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Judge Claria Horn Boom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
