Cases 11 - 20 of 598
Hailey v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William T. Hailey
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center, Chief Trimmer and Capt. Timothy Burchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Corewell Health et al
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael Logan
Defendant:
Corewell Health, Trinity Health, Humana Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry, Luke Whittaker, Shawn Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Gray v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv10526
Plaintiff:
Nijyal S. Gray
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan Department of Health & Human Services and Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Tiffany Williams, Logan Edwards, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Logan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burton et al v. Winn et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Logan Burton, Marc Zdrojewski, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Cody Clay Winn, Market Modern, LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
