Cases 11 - 20 of 355
Stubbs v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv10129
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs
Defendant:
T. Jackson, A. Crawford and C. LaBreck
Maria Lopez Pablo De De Leon, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-4027
Petitioner:
MARIA BERTAO LOPEZ PABLO DE DE LEON, MANOLO GILBERTO DE LEON LOPEZ, ABILIA MARVELI DE LEON LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Whyte v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Brenna K. Bell, Jennings H, Jones, Donna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tovar et al v. Eldridge Farms, LLC. et al
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Alegria Tovar, Gaudencio Delgado Bautista, Ricardo Garcia Arriaga and others
Defendant:
Eldridge Farms, LLC. and Bryan L. Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ricardo Martinez-Porte v. Multi-Color Corporation, et al
as 23-3971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO MARTINEZ-PORTE
Defendant / Appellee:
MULTI-COLOR CORPORATION and W/S PACKAGING GROUP, INC.
Joseph Shine-Johnson, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 23-3861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH T. SHINE-JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
RUBIN WILLIAMS, ANTONIO HENDERSON, JARRON EARLEY-TABOR, SR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, AMY ACTON, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH and others
Morin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03257
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Morin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ricardo Rodriguez Sanchez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3737
Petitioner:
RICARDO RODRIGUEZ SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Stubbs #304356 v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs #304356
Defendant:
Michael Brown and Rachael Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo EdmondsIn re: Ricardo Edmonds
as 23-1748
Petitioner:
In re: RICARDO WARREN EDMONDS
Respondent:
MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
