Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Troxell v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Diana Troxell
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Troxel Hellmer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03712
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Troxel Hellmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Troxel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01020
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Troxel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Flowers v. The Troxel Company et al
as 2:2018cv02639
Defendant:
Fastenal Company and The Troxel Company
Plaintiff:
Veronica Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Troxel Company v. Monarch Steel of Alabama, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02651
Plaintiff:
The Troxel Company
Defendant:
Monarch Steel of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Troxel Company v. Engineered Plastic Components, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00402
Defendant:
Engineered Plastic Components, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Troxel Company
Counter_claimant:
Engineered Plastic Components, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
The Troxel Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Troxell v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00194
Plaintiff:
Jacob Troxell
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Troxell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv00755
Plaintiff:
Debra Troxell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burks et al v. Troxel et al
as 1:2009cv00856
Plaintiff:
Reggie Bernard Burks, Sr. and Jacqueline Gail Burks
Defendant:
Todd Troxel and Petoskey, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
