Cases 21 - 30 of 391
USA v. John Bradshaw
as 21-2965
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LONDON BRADSHAW
Bradshaw v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Reginald Timothy Bradshaw
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Electrical Workers Insurance Fund et al v. Ricardo Bradshaw
as 2:2021cv11229
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers Insurance Fund and Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Fund for the Electrical Industry, Detroit, Michigan
Defendant:
Ricardo Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bradshaw et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01919
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peggye Bradshaw and Randy Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradshaw v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01048
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv01098
Plaintiff:
Sarah Stoddard and Angelic Johnson
Defendant:
Jeannette Bradshaw and Jocelyn Benson
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Yvonne White, Democratic National Committee, City of Detroit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bally et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv01088
Defendant:
Mary Hall-Thiam, Jeannette Bradshaw, Jonathan Kinloch and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Hatch, Steven Butler, Lena Bally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv01035
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Plaintiff:
Reginald Timothy Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledford v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, John Doe I-X, Corey Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Ledford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradshaw v. Joyner
as 7:2020cv00082
Petitioner:
Dalten Bradshaw and Dalton Bradshaw
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
