Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Dille Road Recycling, LLC
as 1:2020cv01053
Defendant:
Dille Road Recycling, LLC
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ade Brown v. John Davids, et al
as 19-1557
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] KUTOWIKS, C/O, [UNKNOWN] ZURAD, C/O, [UNKNOWN] MONTGOMERY, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADE BROWN
Patton et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11332
Plaintiff:
Brenda Linders, Roderick Duhon, Mark Price and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mitchell v. Washington et al
as 2:2019cv10633
Defendant:
Mr. Kinner, Grant, Ms. V. Hinorosa and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Mitchell
Dill v. San Roman et al
as 5:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Carlos Rodolfo San Roman and KNM Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Dill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown #884273 v. Davids et al
as 1:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Unknown Mygrants, Uknown Doane, Unknown Kerr and others
Plaintiff:
Ade Brown #884273
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly v. Ottawa, County of
as 1:2018cv01149
Defendant:
SEAN KELLY, CAPTAIN BRANDON DEHAAN, POLICE OFFICER COLLIN WALLACE and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Reilly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dills v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. (TV2)
as 3:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dills
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jennifer Mason, et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam,, et al
as 16-2313
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JENNIFER MASON, CARL ROGERS, II, TERESA SPRINGER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, P.C., a Michigan corporation and LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS NEWNAM, INC., a Texas corporation
Defendant:
LEO A. DALY COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
