Cases 21 - 30 of 820
Nwokoro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02246
Petitioner:
Uwanbunkonye Nwokoro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Butterfield v. Harrison
as 1:2024cv10468
Plaintiff:
Carey Butterfield, d/b/a Butterfield Used Cars and Wholesaling and Carey Butterfield Doing business as Butterfield Used Cars and Wholesaling
Defendant:
Allison Leigh Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
USA v. Jeffrey Harrison
as 24-3284
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JEFFREY LAMONT HARRISON
Johnson v. Harrison et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Steven Harrison, Taffy Ann Wilson and Samuel F Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayyed v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02083
Petitioner:
Aziz Ihab Sayyed and Azia Ihab Sayyed
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Padgett v. Slatery
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Garner Dwight Padgett
Defendant:
Herbert Harrison Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Glenn Prentice, Sr. v. NewRez LLC, et al
as 24-1088
Plaintiff:
GLENN MICHAEL PRENTICE, SR.
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, TROTT LAW, P.C., MARCY J. FORD and others
Jones #529086 v. Juarez et al
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
James Jones #529086 and PREA Victim
Defendant:
Unknown Juarez, Nathan Brooke, Riccardo Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody et al v. Gartha et al
as 2:2024cv10120
Plaintiff:
Jerry Moody and Tracey Moody
Defendant:
Russell Charles Gartha, Harrison Ray Higgins, City of Southfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
