Cases 21 - 30 of 129
Thigpen v. Davies et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Robert E. Lee Davies, William Acree, Don Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Warden FCI Memphis
as 2:2021cv02487
Petitioner:
Derrick M. Jones
Respondent:
Warden FCI Memphis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Edward Jones
as 21-3550
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD M. JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03133
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. JONES and EVERETT A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dill v. Jones et al
as 3:2021cv00014
Defendant:
M. Jones and Robertson County Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Dustin Roy Knight Dill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Downs et al
as 5:2020cv00470
Defendant:
Corizon Corp., Dr. Downs and Corizon, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kebra M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Downs et al
as 3:2020cv00775
Defendant:
Corizon Corp. and Dr. Downs
Plaintiff:
Kebra M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Calloway County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2020cv00043
Defendant:
A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in Calloway County, Kentucky, Jeanette M. Jones and Tim L. Nuckolls
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Carter et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2020cv10370
Plaintiff:
Samuel McNeal, Effern Bingham, Rickey Blumerich and others
Defendant:
Andy Dillon, Michael Glasgow, Bradley Wurfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marchbanks et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10322
Plaintiff:
Mary P. Alexander, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Leo A. Daly Company, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
