Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,681
Satkowiak et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv11229
Plaintiff: Paul Satkowiak and Prizza Satkowiak
Defendant: Brian Marshall and Justin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff: McClain Durst
Defendant: Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01873
Plaintiff: Tammy Marshall
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Collier v. Love et al
as 2:2024cv11213
Plaintiff: Jammie Collier
Defendant: Christopher Love, Kenneth Monroe, United States Marshal Service and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff: SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant: DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3388
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kuhl v. Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff: Samuel Alexander Kuhl
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant: Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tomblin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01676
Plaintiff: Marshall Tomblin
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Farrer et al v. Global Tax Network Great Lakes, LLC
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff: Heather Farrer and Marshall Farrer
Defendant: Global Tax Network Great Lakes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?