Cases 21 - 30 of 442
Rodger Nesto, Jr. v. James Corrigan
as 23-1081
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODGER A. NESTO, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES CORRIGAN, Warden
Rodgers v. Hope College
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Joseph O. Rodgers, Elise Carter and Emily Damaska
Defendant:
Hope College
Petitioner:
Jennie Devries
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Schrimer v. Powell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Tyler Schrimer and Tyler Schirmer
Defendant:
Powell County Detention Center, Powell County Sheriff Department, George Nester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Michigan, State of et al
as 4:2022cv13150
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bradley Lane, Merik Whipple and others
Rodgers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04232
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH RODGERS, ANTICIPATED PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF DAVID RODGERS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Alexis Rodgers
as 22-1951
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXIS REDD RODGERS
Anglea et al v. Flash Market, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02621
Plaintiff:
Amber Anglea, Clara Ballard, Tanna Ballard and others
Defendant:
Flash Market, LLC and PFMFC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pelusio et al v. Knox County et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Brent Pelusio and monica pelusio
Defendant:
Knox County, Knox County Board of Education, John Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kalucki v. ITS Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kalucki
Defendant:
ITS Technologies, Inc., ITS Holding Company, Inc., Roger Radeloff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
USA v. Rodger Moore
as 22-5606
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODGER W. MOORE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
