Cases 21 - 30 of 435
Tate v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv02420
Plaintiff:
tate: darren-levon: ex rel Darren-Levon Tate also known as Darren Levon Tate doing business as Darren L. Tate and Darren Levon Tate
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, City of Bartlett and Bartlett City Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tate David Prows and Ann Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Laura Borso, Sam Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jelonn Tate
as 23-5223
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JELONN MARQUISE TATE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Raymond Tate v. USA
as 22-6098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND TATE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tate Prows and Tate David Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English v. City of Metro Louisville et al
as 3:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. English
Defendant:
City of Metro Louisville, Wanda Mitchell-Smith, Regina Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tate #320422 v. Tanner et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Keith Tate #320422
Defendant:
Unknown Tanner, Patricia Lamb, Sherri Castenholz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sallaj v. The Summit Apartments
as 3:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sallaj
Defendant:
The Summit Apartments, Calvin L. Tate and Schatten Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
