Cases 21 - 30 of 467
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lechner v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Ted Lechner
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Bowman v. City of Fairview Park et al
as 1:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Ted Bowman
Defendant:
City of Fairview Park, City of North Olmsted, Matthew Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osumili et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Ese Nkem Osumili, Uwaoma Osumili, Onuweoma Osumili and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hottenrott et al v. Iron, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Tammy Moyer, Karen Hottenrott, Tammy Cairns and others
Defendant:
Iron, County of, Melanie Camps, Menominee, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Farber v. Athena of SC, LLC
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Stephen Farber and John Maisel
Defendant:
Athena of SC, LLC and Ted Doukas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dayley et al v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
Ted R. Dayley and Nancy Dayley
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc., DAVOL,INC./C.R. BARD, INC. and Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Charles Tingler v. Catherine Hastings, et al
as 23-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TINGLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHERINE HASTINGS, Parole Officer, JAMES WILSON, Senior Parole Officer, TED DAVIS, Unit Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
