Cases 31 - 40 of 153
Coker v. Whitley County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Coker
Defendant:
Whitley County, Kentucky, Sheriff Todd Shelley, Deputy Chad Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv03577
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
James Toby Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Helton v. Laws et al
as 2:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Davis, Coffey, Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Freeport, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ann Coffey
Defendant:
Freeport, City of, MAS Roofing and HomeStart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey et al v. Champlin Living Trust et al (JRG3)
as 3:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Southeastern Development, Samuel A. Pinner, Geoffrey Champlin and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Coffey and Dr. Brandon Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pryor v. Evans et al
as 3:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Pryor
Defendant:
Officer Brassfield, K Coffey, Srg Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doctors Coffey Internal Medicine & Family Care, LLC v. Grange Insurance Company (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Grange Insurance Company and Grange Mutual Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Doctors Coffey Internal Medicine & Family Care, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slade v. Jefferson County et al
as 3:2020cv00513
Defendant:
TN Jefferson County, David Hager, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Slade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00930
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. Jefferson County et al
as 2:2020cv00225
Defendant:
TN Jefferson County, Gwen Boyer, Glen Ballinger and others
Plaintiff:
Brandi Stewart and Brandi Lynn Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
