Cases 31 - 40 of 811
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv10511
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Police Department Sterling Heights, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Sterling Heights Police Department, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Maguinuss et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Thomas
Defendant:
Evon Maguinuss, Liz Hodge, Jackie Matheny, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Maria Ortiz-Lopez
as 24-5096
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIA RUBI ORTIZ-LOPEZ
Padilla Lopez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Reyna Padilla Lopez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Aster Elements, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
Aster Elements, Inc., Joseph Lopez and Susan Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maria Lopez Pablo De De Leon, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-4027
Petitioner:
MARIA BERTAO LOPEZ PABLO DE DE LEON, MANOLO GILBERTO DE LEON LOPEZ, ABILIA MARVELI DE LEON LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
