Cases 31 - 40 of 168
Mathis v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2020cv00866
Defendant:
United States Postmaster General, United States Attorney General, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Evonna Mathis and RESTRICTED FILER Evonna Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Dept. of Justice Center
as 1:2020cv00711
Plaintiff:
Evonna Mathis
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Dept. of Justice Center and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jabbi v. United States Marshal Service
as 5:2020cv00338
Plaintiff:
Abdourahman Jabbi
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson v. Sell et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Neal Pinkston, Chattanooga, TN Housing Authority, Andrew Basler and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devan Pierson v. Grayson County Detention Ctr, et al
as 20-5366
Defendant / Appellee:
M.D. PAUL THOMAS, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, [UNKNOWN] OFFICER NO. 2, Officer at Grayson County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVAN LAMONT PIERSON
Chadwick Miller v. United States Marshal Service
as 20-3333
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
Brodie v. United States Marshall Service
as 3:2020cv00095
Respondent:
United States Marshall Service
Petitioner:
Robert E. Brodie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cain v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv12483
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cain
Sinkfield v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv00392
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Armond Budish, Kenneth Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
