Cases 31 - 40 of 695
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hineson v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hineson
Defendant:
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-106
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
MARK D. CHAPMAN, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE, CLAY KINCHELOE and others
Hineson v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hineson
Defendant:
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade #434839 v. Braman, et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Dione Andre Wade #434839
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristie Marie Van Harn and Melinda Braman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv11199
Plaintiff:
Dione Andre Wade
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristie Marie Van Harn and Melinda Braman
Klopp v. Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
William Klopp
Defendant:
Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board, Justin Mitchell, Sarah Weedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley #364936 v. Woods et al
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wade S Bradley #364936 and Wade S. Bradley #364936
Defendant:
Rafeek Woods, Noah Arker, Unknown Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WADE v. MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
as 3:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY WADE
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
