Cases 31 - 40 of 1,027
Austin v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv10444
Plaintiff:
James Shannon Austin
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and John Doe
Gary Paul v. Whitley County, KY Detention Center, et al
as 24-5142
Plaintiff:
GARY W. PAUL
Defendant:
WHITLEY COUNTY, KY DETENTION CENTER, WHITLEY COUNTY, KY FISCAL COURT, BRIAN LAWSON, Individually and others
Johnson v. Gowdy et al
as 2:2024cv10385
Plaintiff:
Kenneth LaVaughn Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Gowdy, K. Cargor, Trotta and others
United States of America v. Delgado et al
as 1:2024mc50151
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ricardo Delgado, II, Gregory Martin Hayes, Austin Antonio Saucedo and others
Petitioner:
Devica Thompson-Pratt
Sullivan v. Dr. Ryzhkova et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Braddie E. Sullivan
Defendant:
Dr. Ryzhkova, Ms. Paden, Ms. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MGPI of Indiana, LLC v. City of Williamstown, KY et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
MGPI of Indiana, LLC
Defendant:
City of Williamstown, KY, Williamstown City Council, Kim Crupper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Austin v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv10314
Plaintiff:
James Shannon Austin
Defendant:
John Doe, Boyd and Parnall
Spence v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wesley Spence, Jr.
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Austin Garrett, Cerion Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Howard Brown
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Karli Thomas and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darren Johnson v. Sirena Landfair, et al
as 24-1078
Plaintiff:
DARREN DEON JOHNSON
Defendant:
SIRENA LANDFAIR, KRISTEN A. AUSTIN, Health Unit Manager, JOSHUA CZARWIOWSKI, ARN 13 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
