Cases 31 - 40 of 19,445
Muniz v. Farnsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Rufino Muniz
Defendant:
William Farnsworth and Mackie Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cumalander v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
William Mark Cumalander
Defendant:
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith-El v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv11370
Plaintiff:
Sheik D. Smith-El
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dana Nessel, Detroit Land Bank Authority and others
Mabry et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
William Mabry and Joyce Mabry
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
William Cope, Jr. v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, et al
as 24-5496
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS COPE, JR.
Defendant:
LUTHER LUCKETT CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, et al., AMY ROBEY, Warden, PATRICIA GUNTER, Deputy Security and others
Lightner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
William Lightner, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCullom v. Newark Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. McCullom
Defendant:
Newark Police Department, Officer Alex Colles, Officer Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02836
Plaintiff:
Erica Williams
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
