Cases 41 - 50 of 6,107
Hanover American Insurance Company v. Tattooed Millionaire Entertainment, LLC, et al
as 24-5452
Plaintiff:
HANOVER AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TATTOOED MILLIONAIRE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, CHRISTOPHER C. BROWN and JOHN FALLS
Hanover American Insurance Company v. Tattooed Millionaire Entertainment, LLC, et al
as 24-5453
Plaintiff:
HANOVER AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TATTOOED MILLIONAIRE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, CHRISTOPHER C. BROWN and JOHN FALLS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carl Puckett, et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 24-5282
Plaintiff:
CARL PUCKETT, MARCELLA PUCKETT and CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR.
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Green, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2024cv10917
Plaintiff:
Barbie Green, Karen Malmkar, Maria Garza and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Brown v. United States Penitentiary Big Sandy et al
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Big Sandy, Lt. D. Sibera, Lt. L. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Franklin County Commisioners et al
as 2:2024cv02163
Plaintiff:
Wayne Brown and Wayne Lee Brown-Bey
Defendant:
Franklin County Commisioners, David Young, Richard Rezie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thermal Surgical, LLC v. Brown
as 2:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Thermal Surgical, LLC
Defendant:
Jeff Brown
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Larry Brown, II v. Michael DeMartino
as 24-3293
Petitioner:
LARRY E. BROWN, II
Respondent:
JENNY HILDEBRAND, Warden, London Correctional Institution and MICHAEL DEMARTINO, Acting Warden, London Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
