Cases 41 - 50 of 181
Boggs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05404
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Ethicon Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00867
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gail Boggs
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, William Pelham Barr and Donald Q. Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Boggs et al v. Mercy Ambulance of Evansville, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Mercy Ambulance of Evansville, Inc. doing business as Lifeguard Ambulance
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Boggs and Kimberly Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kelley v. Carter County Detention Center et al
as 0:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Kelley
Defendant:
Shawn Moore, Robert W. Boggs and Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs et al v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00872
Plaintiff:
Paula Boggs, Randall Boggs and Paula A. Boggs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Boggs v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv01825
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. USA
as 6:2020cv00100
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alicia Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Klosterman v. Sedamsville Community Development Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Lonnie Wise, Patricia A. Burke, Mayor John Cranley and others
Plaintiff:
John Klosterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01381
Plaintiff:
Bobby Boggs and Stephene Boggs
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nard et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2020cv10356
Plaintiff:
E. B., Eric Gatewood, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Daugherty Johnson, Gerald Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
