Cases 41 - 50 of 808
Integrity Express Logistics, LLC v. Grgurich et al
as 1:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Integrity Express Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Neal Grgurich, Gary McCutcheon, III, GD Ventures Brokerage, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
McClellan v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jasmine McClellan
Defendant:
Emmitt Neal and B.T. Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Fenton v. Story et al
as 1:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ryan Fenton
Defendant:
Virginia Lee Story, Michael Weimar Binkley, Kathryn Lynn Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hershey #255571 v. Harwood et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hershey #255571
Defendant:
Unknown Harwood, Unknown Cox, Unknown Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Mourice Neal El v. Matt Pugh, et al
as 23-3708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOURICE NEAL EL
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT PUGH and OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
Neal v. HBD/Thermoid, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Randy Paul Neal
Defendant:
HBD/Thermoid, Inc. and HBD Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Neal #236735 v. Pelkey
as 1:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Cordall Neal #236735
Defendant:
Unknown Pelkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
