Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,491
Williams #244723 v. Coleman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff: Raynard Williams #244723
Defendant: Rick Coleman, Kathy Sherwood, Tamerla Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00611
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Feeser et al v. Carter et al
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff: Joey Feeser and Kimberly Feeser
Defendant: Kevin Carter, Rick Carter and Tennessee Trailer Transport Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Concord Music Group, Inc. v. X Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00606
Plaintiff: Concord Music Group, Inc., Universal Music Corp. doing business as 360 Music doing business as Universal Music Works, Songs of Universal, Inc. doing business as Universal Music Works doing business as Universal Tunes and others
Defendant: X Corp doing business as Twitter
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
Hmoud, et al v. City Of Cincinnati, et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff: ahmad hmoud and Liberty Used Tires, LLC
Defendant: City Of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Emily Smart Woerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Synergy Motorsports LLC v. Hollenback et al
as 2:2023cv10750
Plaintiff: Synergy Motorsports LLC
Defendant: Rick Hollenback, Dallas Morris, Synergy Motorsports Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Daniels v. Crall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00037
Plaintiff: John Larry Daniels and David W. WIlliams
Defendant: Doug Crall, Federic Kemen, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?