Cases 51 - 60 of 403
Rivera v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Saulnette Rivera
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dixon et al v. TSK Express, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Frankie Dixon, Monique Pridgen, Ernesto Yaque and others
Defendant:
TSK Express, LLC, NJ Expedite, LLC and Nemanja Jerkovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Charles Brown v. Buddy Sivert, et al
as 22-3091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT BUDDY SIVERT, CITY OF LORAIN, OH, POLICE OFFICER STEYVEN G. CURRY and others
Smith v. Lowbridge et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Jason Lowbridge and Andrew Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collado-Rivera v. USA
as 2:2022cv00151
Petitioner:
Oscar M Collado-Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rivera v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05898
Plaintiff:
Rosa Rivera
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomas Rivera v. Merrick Garland
as 21-4118
Petitioner:
TOMAS ROLANDO RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Grantonz, et al v. Earley, et al
as 1:2021cv02137
Plaintiff:
Ebony Grantonz and Sylvester White
Defendant:
Michelle D. Earley, Russell R. Brown III, Tanya Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reedy Group Inc. v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 1:2021cv00944
Plaintiff:
Reedy Group Inc.
Defendant:
Small Business Administration, Isabella Casillas Guzman, James Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Whipple v. Jolley et al
as 3:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Robert Z Whipple, III
Defendant:
David Jolley, Elaine Rivera, Charlotte Luckstone and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
