Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bird v. Cargill, Incorporated
as 1:2022cv02035
Plaintiff:
David Bird
Defendant:
Cargill, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Corbett et al v. Cargill Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Corbett, Jr. and Christopher G. Hunt
Defendant:
Cargill Incorporated and Southern States Cooperative, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Village of Camden, Ohio v. Cargill, Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00273
Defendant:
R. Good Rentals, LLC, Cargill, Incorporated, Good Rail & Truck Transfer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Village of Camden, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Village of Camden, Ohio v. Cargill, Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00202
Defendant:
Cargill, Incorporated and Central Salt L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Village of Camden, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Huff et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00469
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Huff
Defendant:
Cargill, Incorporated, Southern States Somerset Cooperative, Incorporated and AGCO Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huff et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv00354
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Huff
Defendant:
AGCO Corporation and Cargill, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
