Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Riddle #811130 v. James et al
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Trequan Riddle #811130
Defendant:
Brenda James, Charles Scott, Unknown Kubant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle #811130 v. Moyer et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Trequan Riddle #811130
Defendant:
S. Moyer, Sabrina Aiken, Brenda James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hensley v. Einalem LLC (PLR1)
as 3:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Einalem, LLC, d/b/a VapeDaugz, LLC, d/b/a Vape Daugz Premium E-Liquid, Charles Scott and Melanie Scott
Plaintiff:
Hannah E. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gresham #272603 v. Falk et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Charles Scott, Patricia Lamb, Joe Wixstrom and others
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cook v. Corizon, et al
as 19-1660
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, Private Michigan Corporation which provides Medical Care, JOE WIXTROM, Nurse, SABRINA DAVIS, Resident Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COOK
Harvey #147594 v. Washington et al
as 2:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lamarr Harvey #147594
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Gabe Glusing, Brenda James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott #158990 v. Rewerts
as 1:2018cv00431
Petitioner:
Leroy Charles Scott #158990
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook #290601 v. Corizon et al
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cook #290601
Defendant:
Corizon, Gabriel Gluesing, Joe Wixtrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Auto Part City, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2018cv10494
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Defendant:
Auto Part City, L.L.C. , Joseph Savaya and Jason Brikho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wright v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dustin Shane Wright
Defendant:
Fentress County, Tennessee and Charles Scott Cravens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
