Cases 1 - 10 of 121
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Martin v. Whitmer et al
as 5:2024cv10551
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington, John Christiansen and others
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Joseph MacDonald, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. South Haven, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lisa MacDonald and Stephen Ernster
Defendant:
City of South Haven, South Haven, City of and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
