Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Imber v. The City of Covington, Kentucky et al
as 2:2026cv00299
Plaintiff:
Logan Imber
Defendant:
The City of Covington, Kentucky, Mandie Appleman, Kenzy Hotaling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boatman et al. v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2026sf65095
Plaintiff:
Mandie Boatman, Corey Goode, Katie Kjonaas and others
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: E. Palestine Train Derailment
as 26-3499
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ADAMS, ERIC ADKINS, IAN BAKER and others
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Lemma Getachew, et al v. City of Willowick, et al
as 26-3363
Plaintiff:
LEMMA GETACHEW and GUENET INDALE
Defendant:
CITY OF WILLOWICK, OH, SEAN BRENNAN, AL FERRITO and others
Weissinger v. Culbertson et al
as 3:2026cv00516
Plaintiff:
Starla Lynette Weissinger
Defendant:
Zachary Culbertson, C. Jay Ingrum, The Ingrum Law Firm, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Mandy et al
as 2:2026cv11256
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Romell Banks
Defendant:
Mandy and Raby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks #530128 v. Mandy et al
as 1:2026cv01132
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Romell Banks #530128
Defendant:
Unknown Mandy and Unknown Raby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Douglas Dewar, Mandy Denton Et Al
as 3:2026mc00017
Unknown:
Douglas Dewar
Plaintiff:
Mandy Denton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
