Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Zelesnik v. Judge Hopkins et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Judge Hopkins, PNC Bank, Jane Menke and others
Jeremy Kerr v. Keith Lenz, et al
as 23-3479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY LYNN KERR
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH LENZ, EDWARD LEE SCHIMMEL, HIZER & SCHIMMEL and others
USA v. $21,500.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$21,500.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Mimi Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Carter v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Antonius Carter
Defendant:
Mimi Lawrence, Chief Austin Boldie, Corporal Eric Yevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Lenz et al
as 3:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kerr
Defendant:
Keith Lenz, Edward L Schimmel, Hizer & Schimmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Staats v. Kentwood Public Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv00832
Defendant:
Mary Madden, Kentwood Public Schools Board of Education, Kevin Polston and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Staats, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Mimi Chang
as 20-3627
Defendant / Appellant:
MIMI CHANG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA, ex rel Joseph Odish, et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, et al
as 19-1693
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE ELLISON, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., LARRY PAGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ODISH and CRANBROOK CAPITAL CONSULTING GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel and MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Mimi v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02197
Defendant:
Withers Randy, HD Development of Maryland, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Withers Lavette Mimi
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
