Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tretchler v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Zachary Charles Tretchler
Respondent:
Brian S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
John Douglas Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Brian S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Miller v. Black
as 1:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Otis S. Miller
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shanghai Guobo Automotive Parts Co, Ltd. v. CPIC Automotive, Inc., et al.
as 2:2022cv01864
Plaintiff:
Shanghai Guobo Automotive Parts Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
CPIC Automotive, Inc., Thomas S. Miller and Cameron G. Cofer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Miller, II v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00771
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Miller, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bailey v. Ford Motor Company (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Bailey, Mary Mcknatt, Lana Rymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Brown v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13356
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, Randall S. Miller & Associates, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown [E-Filer]
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 0:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv12245
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Tashari S. Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
