Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Swope et al v. Dearborn Heights, City of
as 2:2024cv10240
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kevin Swope, Paul Vanderplow, Jerrod Hart and others
Defendant:
Dearborn Heights, City of
Intervenor:
Dearborn Heights City Council
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Swopes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Swopes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Hale et al v. Swope et al
as 5:2020cv00178
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hale and Dakota Dean
Defendant:
Justin Swope and Danny Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00267
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Swope et al v. Foreign Links Around The Globe, Inc. or "FLAG" et al
as 1:2018cv00707
Defendant:
Foreign Links Around the Globe and Mazi Cunha
Plaintiff:
Timothy Swope and Pamela Swope
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Swope v. Rutherford County Correctional Work Center et al
as 3:2018cv00480
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Swope
Defendant:
Rutherford County Correctional Work Center and Rutherford County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Maple Heights et al
as 1:2017cv01069
Plaintiff:
Aaron Williams
Defendant:
City of Maple Heights , Michael Russo , Derek Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Philip Burke, et al
as 16-6603
Debtor:
In re: PHILIP CRAIG BURKE and NEKOLIA SWOPE BURKE
Appellant:
RICHARD P. JAHN, JR.
Appellee:
PHILIP CRAIG BURKE and NEKOLIA SWOPE BURKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
