Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Siler et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02295
Plaintiff:
Lorie Jean Siler and Lawrence Daniel Siler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Siler v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65135
Plaintiff:
Amy Siler
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Denzil Partin v. Russell Patterson, et al
as 20-5950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENZIL RUSS PARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SILER, Inmate in Campbell County Jail and OFFICER RUSSELL PATTERSON, Campbell County Police Department
Partin v. Patterson et al (PSLC2)
as 3:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Officer Russell Patterson and Ray Siler
Plaintiff:
Denzil Russ Partin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siler v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01204
Plaintiff:
Gil Siler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Theriot #423068 v. Neff et al
as 2:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Unknown Cole, Unknown Clay, Paul L. Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siler v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Anne Siler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White #285964 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of State Police, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
