Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Marilyn Donald, et al v. Bonner, et al
as 2:2023cv02738
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Shelby County and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Donald and Charles Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Baker v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ronnie T. Baker
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Ruby Joyner and Beth Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Baker v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015dp20130
Plaintiff:
Deborah T. Baker
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Tecnomagnete, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv12903
Plaintiff:
David T Baker
Defendant:
Tecnomagnete, Inc. and Tecnomagnete S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronely Chambers v. State of Michigan, et al
as 12-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONELY DESHON CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Baker v. Mahony et al
as 3:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
Ronnie T. Baker
Defendant:
Vicki Mahony, Patricia Redman, f/n/u Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Mahony et al
as 3:2011cv01089
Plaintiff:
Ronnie T. Baker
Defendant:
Vicki Mahony, Patricia Redman, f/n/u Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers #184773 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ronely Deshon Chambers #184773
Defendant:
T. Thomsen, D. Cassel, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Baker et al
as 6:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Vincent Eugene Walker
Defendant:
T. Baker, D. Vires, W. Reams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
