Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Hudson v. Martins
as 1:2020cv05663
Defendant:
Rilwan Martins, Gaines, F and Wooten and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOOTEN v. POWELL
as 1:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. WOOTEN
Defendant:
P. POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Hoftiezer et al
as 2:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Tracy L Thompson, William B Kelley, Scott Hofteizer and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley A Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOEL v. GREEN et al
as 1:2019cv04824
Defendant:
MYLA A. ELDRIDGE, FRANKLIN WOOTEN, KENNETH GREER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zurbriggen et al v. Twin Hill Acquisition, Inc.
as 1:2017cv05648
Plaintiff:
Thor Zurbriggen, Dena Catan, Christina H. Endicott and others
Defendant:
Twin Hill Acquisition, Inc., American Airlines Group Inc., Envoy Air Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOTEN v. LAYTON
as 1:2019cv02626
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. WOOTEN
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanika Day, et al v. Franklin Wooten, et al
as 19-1972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANIKA DAY, individualy, and as the Administrator for the ESTATE OF TERRELL DAY and HARVEY MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDALL DENNY and FRANKLIN WOOTEN, Sergeant
Shanika Day, et al v. Franklin Wooten, et al
as 19-1930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANIKA DAY, individualy, and as the Administrator for the ESTATE OF TERRELL DAY and HARVEY MORGAN
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDALL DENNY and FRANKLIN WOOTEN, Sergeant
WOOTEN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02590
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY WOOTEN and DANNY WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Wooten v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01550
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Chelise Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
