Cases 61 - 70 of 37,783
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coonradt et al v. Strogoteanu et al
as 0:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jordan Coonradt and Rhonda Eunice Schoeszler
Defendant:
Mihai Strogoteanu, Allens Towing and Maple Grove PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belt v. City of Rapid City et al
as 5:2024cv05021
Plaintiff:
William Belt
Defendant:
City of Rapid City and Michelle Paulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Turner v. City of Hope-Medical Corportaion Duarte CA et al
as 4:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
City of Hope-Medical Corporation Duarte CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
The Liberty Initiative, Inc. v. Washington County, Arkansas
as 5:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
The Liberty Initiative, Inc. doing business as Arkansas Justice Reform Coalition
Defendant:
Washington County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
