Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 37,751
Armstrong v. St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
as 0:2024cv02185
Plaintiff: Seth A. Armstrong
Defendant: St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Siddiq v. Tollette et al
as 4:2024cv00495
Plaintiff: Sadrud-Din Siddiq, Jr
Defendant: Tollette, Boyd, Perichi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Marquez v. Peterson et al
as 5:2024cv05041
Plaintiff: Christina M. Marquez
Defendant: Nicholas J. Peterson, Pennington County Public Defender's Office, Rachael Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Chamberlain v. London
as 0:2024cv02184
Plaintiff: Dagan Chamberlain
Defendant: Bruce London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02182
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Plaintiff: Frederick Jones
Defendant: Arkansas Insurance Department and Latonya Honorable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Marks v. North Saint Paul Police Dept. et al
as 0:2024cv02170
Plaintiff: Marisa E Marks
Defendant: North Saint Paul Police Dept., Saint Paul Police Dept. and Roseville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02175
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?