Cases 31 - 40 of 74,228
Crumley v. Mallory
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Vincent Crumley, Jr
Defendant:
Mallory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruelas v. Benton County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv05130
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Benton County Jail and Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. Butler County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Quinton Wesley Schultz
Defendant:
Butler County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mounce v. Hickman et al
as 4:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Rickie L. Mounce
Defendant:
Jason Hickman and Charles Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Texas County, Missouri
as 6:2024cv03182
Plaintiff:
Bentley Walker, Regina Walker, D.S. and others
Defendant:
Texas County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hochstetler v. Sarpy County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Sheridan Hochstetler
Defendant:
Sarpy County Department of Corrections, Wellpath Care, Inc., Ryan J. Mahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milsap v. Clay County et al
as 3:2024cv03017
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramone Milsap
Respondent:
Clay County and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wong v. Warden, Yankton Federal Prison Camp
as 4:2024cv04117
Petitioner:
Eugene Ka Lok Wong
Respondent:
Warden, Yankton Federal Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ducharme v. USA
as 3:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Whitehorse Ducharme
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ruelas v. Harper
as 5:2024cv05127
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Ruelas
Defendant:
Chief of Police Cody Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
