Cases 51 - 60 of 74,254
Timothy Nesdahl v. C. Garrett
as 24-2318
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Nesdahl
Defendant:
C. Garrett, Warden, FCC Forrest City
Rodric Cohns v. Quintin Mixon, et al
as 24-2322
Plaintiff:
Rodric D. Cohns
Defendant:
Quintin Mixon, Captain, Cummins Unit, Curry Branham, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, William Taylor, Sergeant, Cummins Unit and others
Suarez Villa v. United States of America, The
as 0:2024cv01584
Petitioner:
Eduardo Suarez Villa
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moreland v. USA
as 4:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Carl W Moreland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gibson v. USA
as 6:2024cv03181
Petitioner:
Joseph W. Gibson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shoulders v. Hardy et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Roderick Davontae Shoulders
Defendant:
Hardy, Harmon, Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milsap v. Clay County et al
as 4:2024cv04120
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramone Milsap
Respondent:
Clay County and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricky Sieler v. Warden Teresa Bittinger, et al
as 24-2307
Petitioner:
Ricky Jay Sieler
Respondent:
Warden Teresa L. Bittinger and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Krishonn Cooney v. Billy Alvey, et al
as 24-2299
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Billy Alvey, DTF Agent, Ark 15th DTF, Carl Boyce, Investigator, Conway County Dentention Center, Brady Knuckles, State Police Officer, Arkansas State Police and others
Krishonn Cooney v. Chad Wilson, et al
as 24-2312
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Chad Wilson, Narcotics Investigator, Conway Police Department, Matthew Tucker, Sgt., Conway Police Department and Kelton Smith, Officer, Conway Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
