Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Candace Bishop, et al v. United States
as 23-2223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Candace Bishop, Personal Representative for the Estate of Charles Edward Bishop, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bishop, Jr., Estate Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Zuhayr El v. Snead et al
as 2:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Affan Siraj Zuhayr El
Defendant:
Dustin Snead, MO Dept. of Conservation, Roy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Stenehjem et al
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Dick Gulmon, Jeffrey Erickson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv03002
Plaintiff:
Candace Bishop
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bishop v. Levine M.D. et al
as 0:2018cv02741
Defendant:
Richard D Levine M.D. and Fairview Hospital, UMMC
Plaintiff:
Ernest Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voss v. Ricketts et al
as 4:2015cv03137
Defendant:
Riko E. Bishop, Teresa Brown, Travis D. Hobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dewey Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sykes v. Pine Lawn, City of, et al.
as 4:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
Mary Sykes
Defendant:
Pine Lawn, City of , Sylvester Caldwell, Olimes Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Daywitt et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2014cv04526
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Daywitt and Merel E. Bishop
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loruwe Lumanga v. Riko Bishop, et al
as 14-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Loruwe Lukuda Lumanga
Defendant - Appellee:
Riko Bishop, Vicki Powell, Jack Schultz and others
Bishop v. Enterprise Car Rental Co et al
as 2:2014cv02002
Plaintiff:
Allen Ray Bishop
Defendant:
Enterprise Car Rental Co and Robert Fann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
