Cases 1 - 10 of 578
Campbell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01788
Petitioner:
Clifton Scott Campbell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moon v. USA
as 4:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Moon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carlson v. Burdick
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson
Respondent:
Birch P. Burdick and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Masiker v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Masiker
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, White County Detention Center and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurr v. Weber
as 4:2023cv00826
Petitioner:
Jakob Hurr
Respondent:
Scott Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Motto, et al
as 4:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
Todd Mitchell Green
Respondent:
Scott County Court and Motto
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Anders
as 4:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Terrell Reid
Respondent:
Scott Anders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tripp v. Damguard et al
as 4:2023cv04105
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Respondent:
Judge Natalie Damguard, Judge Robbin J. Howman, Thomas Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2467
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden FMC Rochester, Collette Peters, F.B.O.P. Director and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
