Cases 1 - 10 of 5,874
Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company v. Big Apple Designers, Inc.
as 1:2024cv07793
Plaintiff:
Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Big Apple Designers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Gallman v. Spartanburg County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv06373
Plaintiff:
James Edward Gallman
Defendant:
Officer Gonzalez, Officer Apple and Spartanburg County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Apple King LLC v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2024cv03181
Defendant:
John Does 1-99 and BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Apple King LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Moonbug Entertainment Limited, et al. v. BabyBus Co., Ltd., et al.
as 24-6757
Defendant:
BABYBUS (FUJIAN) NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and BABYBUS CO., LTD.
Plaintiff:
MOONBUG ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED and TREASURE STUDIO, INC.
John Anthony Williams v. Chuck Wright
as 24-7042
Defendant:
LT. BISHOP, Lt. of Spartanburg County Detention Center, SERGEANT CLAYTON, BMU, DEPUTY LONGE, BMU and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
CardWare Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 7:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
CardWare Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LaBella et al v. Apple Inc
as 5:2024cv07588
Plaintiff:
Michael Pawson, Stacey Rodgers and Lindsey LaBella
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
George v. Publix Super Markets Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Apples George
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, John Does(s) 1-3 and Publix Super Markets Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
US v. Lateef Fisher
as 24-7035
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LATEEF FISHER, a/k/a Apple
Shulman v. Apple
as 1:2024cv08319
Plaintiff:
Rabbi Menachem Shulman
Defendant:
Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
