Intellectual Property Cases filed in New Mexico matching "S"
Cases 111 - 120 of 829,137
Clarence Davis v. Capital One N.A.
as 24-1507
Plaintiff: CLARENCE DAVIS
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE N.A.
USA v. Robert Bowers
as 24-9002
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROBERT BOWERS
Brian Dillow v. Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 24-2004
Plaintiff: BRIAN DILLOW
Defendant: TREASURER OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner: DAVON TATE
Respondent: WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Adrian Rangel v. Alexi Giannoulias, et al
as 24-1959
Plaintiff: ADRIAN G. RANGEL
Defendant: ALEXI GIANNOULIAS, TOYEAL S. RICE and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner: Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent: S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
Cardona, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv01031
Petitioner: Marcos Cardona, Jr.
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhonda Burnett, et al v. The National Association of Realtors, et al
as 24-2143
Plaintiff: Rhonda Burnett, Jerod Breit, Jeremy Keel and others
Defendant: National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Keller Williams Realty, Inc. and others
Appellant: James Mullis
Heron Cove Association et al v. Gladwin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv11473
Plaintiff: Heron Cove Association, Cynthia Abbs, Brian Abraham and others
Petitioner: Dona Kraft and Tammy Patterson
Defendant: Gladwin County Board of Commissioners and Four Lakes Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Galvan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03084
Plaintiff: Richard S. Galvan
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?