Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Ervin v. Turner et al
as 2:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Michael Neal, Angie Turner, Monroe County, Arkansas and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ervin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seeman et al v. Rice County et al
as 0:2020cv01085
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Neal Pederson, Mark Hilady and others
Plaintiff:
Lori Seeman and Paul Seeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Brad Cole, et al
as 6:2019cv03437
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edward Powers
Defendant:
Phillip Weathers, Brad Cole, Deputy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Webb et al v. Slocum et al
as 3:2019cv00357
Plaintiff:
Christalynn Neal and Jeffery Webb
Defendant:
William Jones, Doyle Fowler, Joe Slocum, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Neal et al
as 4:2019cv00862
Defendant:
Tamina Smith, Pine Bluff Arkansas, City of and Markeith Neal
Plaintiff:
Randy McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis et al v. Neal et al
as 4:2019cv00770
Defendant:
Justice Ferrell, John Does, Rowdy Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Margie Curtis and Larry Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Brooks et al
as 1:2019cv01032
Defendant:
John Doe and Matt Brooks
Plaintiff:
Mark Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv01929
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Apel
Defendant:
Amy Neale, Pike County Commission, Chris Gamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Apel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Apel
Defendant:
Amy Neale, Pike County Commission, Chris Gamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christian Ministerial Alliance et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2019cv00402
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge, Arkansas Board of Apportionment, John Thurston and others
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Community Institute, Christian Ministerial Alliance, Ryan Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
