Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Bennett v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Steven Bennett
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundmark v. Beltrami County et al
as 0:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Lundmark
Defendant:
Beltrami County, Clearwater County, MEnD Correctional Care, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanek v. Sarpy County et al
as 8:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
Megan M. Stanek
Defendant:
Sarpy County, Sarpy County Treasurer, Trace Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mills v. Bennett
as 4:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Alfiya Mills
Defendant:
Jamar Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sitton et al v. Bentonville School District et al
as 5:2021cv05146
Plaintiff:
Matt Sitton, Matthew Bennett and Elizabeth Bennett
Defendant:
Bentonville School District, Dr. Debbie Jones, Eric White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Shields v. Castaneda et al
as 0:2021cv01272
Defendant:
Amanda W. Jonas, Hennepin Healthcare HCMC, Sara Mayes and others
Plaintiff:
Bennett A. Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Bennett et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
James Bennett, The City of Bettendorf and Bettendorf Community School District
Plaintiff:
S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
