Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Boggis v. City of Moorhead et al
as 0:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Todd Boggis
Defendant:
City of Moorhead, Officer J. Hanson, Officer T. Hennen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnett v. Norris et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Nurzuhal Faust, Wendy Kelley, Christopher Budnik and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Mower County Sheriff Office et al
as 0:2019cv01294
Defendant:
Dave Dyke, Jim Lamecker, Ryan Leif and others
Plaintiff:
John-Henry Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnett v. Norris et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arnett
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Roy Hobbs, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danneman v. Van Dyke et al
as 0:2017cv03654
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Danneman
Defendant:
Jamie Van Dyke , Stephen Van Dyke , Norman Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mashburn et al v. Sandusky et al
as 4:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Mashburn and Jessica Nichole Mashburn
Defendant:
Caisee Sandusky , Jason Sundbakken , Darren Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chatt et al v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Rosie Chatt and Dewayne Chatt, Jr
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, Samuel Malone, Steven Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. West Memphis City of et al
as 3:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray McDaniel
Defendant:
West Memphis City of, Paudert, Harvey Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
